Logical Reasoning

This is the fourth of a series of articles on LSAT Logical Reasoning. The series contains the following articles:

LSAT Logical Reasoning: An Introduction
Logical Reasoning Questions
Logical Reasoning Arguments
Logical Reasoning Answers
Logical Reasoning Elimination

Logical Reasoning Answers

After you learn to paraphrase arguments, the next step is to prephrase the logical reasoning answers. Creating your own logical reasoning answers is essential to your success on the LSAT. We cannot emphasize that enough, so we’ll say it again. If you want to move quickly through the LSAT and earn a high score

This series of articles will demonstrate all you need to know about conclusions for the LSAT test. The series covers the following articles:

• LSAT Conclusions: an Introduction
• Finding Conclusions on the LSAT Test: Advanced Techniques
• Conclusion Questions on the LSAT Test
• LSAT Secrets for Conclusions

Introduction to LSAT Conclusions 

On the LSAT Test, the conclusion is the main point of the argument. The primary step in evaluating an argument is to identify the conclusion. The conclusion is so important that some Logical Reasoning questions simply ask you to identify the conclusion. For example:

This is the second of a series of articles on LSAT Logical Reasoning questions. The series contains the following articles:

LSAT Logical Reasoning: An Introduction
Logical Reasoning Questions
Logical Reasoning Arguments
Logical Reasoning Answers
Logical Reasoning Elimination

Logical Reasoning Questions

The first step in the TestSherpa method for Logical Reasoning is reading the questions. Logical reasoning question stems are tucked away between the stimulus and the answer choices, so it’s easy to miss. In fact, your instinct is probably to read the stimulus (argument) first, and then read the logical reasoning question. But there are several reasons you should read the question stem first, before reading the stimulus.

In this final article in the lesson series on LSAT Arguments, we present you with some practice LSAT arguments.

This is the fifth and final article of a series of articles on LSAT Logical Reasoning. The series contains the following articles:

LSAT Logical Reasoning: An Introduction
Logical Reasoning Questions
Logical Reasoning Arguments
Logical Reasoning Answers
Logical Reasoning Elimination

Logical Reasoning Elimination

Learning the types of wrong answers is so important in Logical Reasoning elimination we created an entirely separate lesson article series devoted to it. For now, know that there are certain types of wrong answers that keep coming up on the test, and if you can identify them, you can easily eliminate them.

The TestSherpa process is a proven method for tackling LSAT Logical Reasoning questions. Our students have been getting high LSAT Logical Reasoning scores for years using this method. At first, it may seem tedious to force yourself to follow this process. But the process is the key to high scores, so stick with it until it becomes second nature.

This article is the fourth in a lesson series on LSAT Arguments. This article will discuss the two main types of logic used on the LSAT test. Ah, Logic on the LSAT.. what could be more fun than logic on the LSAT? 

Parallel reasoning questions ask you to identify arguments with similar logic. The argument in the stimulus contains certain patterns that you will match to the arguments in the answer choices.

The skills you need in parallel reasoning are similar to other types of Logical Reasoning questions, with a particular emphasis on your ability to paraphrase arguments.

This article is the first in a series of articles that discusses Parallel Reasoning Questions on the LSAT test. The series includes the following articles: